Industries / General Contractors

Your margin is thin enough already.

You're coordinating subs, managing schedules, chasing change orders, and trying to keep a dozen projects on track, all while operating on margins that leave almost no room for error. Every missed change order, every late invoice, every scheduling conflict, and every hour spent on admin instead of building is money straight off your bottom line.

Book a discovery call See the math
Where GC profit actually goes.

General contracting operates on some of the thinnest margins in any industry. Here is where that margin is being eroded, backed by industry data.

4-6%
Average net profit margin for commercial GCs
CFMA and JMCO 2025 benchmarking data shows commercial GCs average 4-6% net profit. Top performers reach 12%. On a $2M project, that 4-6% is $80,000-$120,000 in profit to show for months of coordination, risk, and capital. One bad sub, one missed scope item, or one untracked change order can wipe that out entirely.
3%+
Margin eroded by change order friction
Research shows change orders decrease average profit margins by approximately 3 percentage points on construction projects. 70% of change order requests go through 2-3 rounds of revision. Teams spend 6-10 hours per week just pricing and submitting change orders, plus more hours chasing approvals. That is administrative time that produces no revenue.
15-25%
Better margins with real-time cost tracking
Contractors who track actual costs against estimates in real time achieve 15-25% better margins than those who wait until project completion. The difference is catching overruns when they are still fixable, not when the project is over and the money is already spent. Most GCs are still running this analysis after the fact, if they run it at all.
~5%
Project cost lost to rework
Current estimates put rework at approximately 5% of total project cost. On a $1M job, that is $50,000 in work that was done once, done wrong, and had to be done again. The primary causes are design coordination failures, unclear RFI responses, and poor communication between trades. All of them are process problems, not skill problems.
What this looks like for a $5M general contractor.
Before and after Vise Systems
A general contractor doing $5M in annual revenue across 8-15 active projects, managing 20+ subcontractor relationships.

Before

Net margin
4-6%
Change order processing
6-10 hrs/week manual
CO approval cycle
2-3 rounds, weeks
Cost tracking
After project completes
Rework cost
~5% of project cost
Sub compliance docs
Manual chase before each job
Financial visibility
Monthly, if someone runs reports

After

Net margin
7-10%
Change order processing
Automated capture and routing
CO approval cycle
Documented, priced, routed in days
Cost tracking
Real-time, every active project
Rework cost
Reduced through better coordination
Sub compliance docs
Automated tracking and alerts
Financial visibility
Real-time dashboard
Estimated annual impact from margin improvement, reduced rework, and recovered change order revenue
$150K - $400K
You're managing everything. Systematizing nothing.

Whether you're a residential builder running 5 projects or a commercial GC running 15, the operational pain points are the same. They just scale differently.

Change orders disappear into email threads

Scope changes happen in the field and get communicated through texts, phone calls, and hallway conversations. By the time someone tries to document and price them, details are missing, backup documentation is gone, and the approval process drags through multiple rounds of revision. That is revenue you earned but may never collect.

Sub coordination is the full-time job nobody signed up for

Scheduling 10-20 subs across multiple active projects, tracking their insurance and compliance docs, managing their payment applications, and making sure nobody is stepping on each other's work. This coordination overhead is invisible on the P&L but it is consuming your project managers' time and creating scheduling conflicts that cause delays.

You don't know a project is over budget until it's over

Budget-to-actual tracking happens after the project is complete, if it happens at all. By then, there is nothing you can do about the overrun. The GCs who perform 15-25% better on margins are the ones tracking costs in real time, not after the fact. That gap is entirely a systems problem.

Estimating is slow and inconsistent

Whether you're self-performing some scope or managing a bid package, your estimates take too long and depend too heavily on whoever builds them. Sub bids come in at different times, in different formats, and get compared on spreadsheets. The bid compilation process alone can take days.

Client communication depends on who's managing the project

Some PMs send regular updates. Others go silent until there's a problem. Some handle change orders professionally. Others let them pile up. Your client experience is inconsistent because you have no system enforcing a standard process. That inconsistency affects referrals, repeat work, and your reputation.

The owner is the bottleneck for everything

Approving bids, reviewing change orders, signing off on invoices, making scheduling decisions. When everything runs through one person, the business moves at the speed of that person's availability. If the owner is on a jobsite all day, nothing in the office moves forward.

The operating system behind the projects.

GCs need all three engines working together. Revenue, production, and back office are deeply interconnected when you're the prime contractor. Here is what the system looks like.

Bid pipeline and estimating

Every opportunity tracked in one pipeline. Sub bids collected, compared, and qualified in a structured system. Your pricing methodology and markup logic built into the estimating engine so bids go out faster and more consistently. Win/loss data tracked so you know which project types and which clients produce the best margins.

Sub management and compliance tracking

Every subcontractor relationship in one system. Insurance certificates tracked with automatic expiration alerts. Prequalification checklists documented. Payment applications processed through a structured workflow. When you need to know which subs are qualified, insured, and available, the answer is one click away instead of five phone calls.

Change order capture and approval workflows

Field teams capture scope changes with photos, descriptions, and notes the moment they are identified. The system prices the change, generates the documentation, and routes it for approval through a defined workflow. No more lost change orders. No more weeks-long approval cycles. No more revenue left on the table because nobody got around to documenting it.

Real-time budget-to-actual tracking

Every active project shows estimated cost vs. actual cost in real time. Material, labor, sub costs, and overhead tracked against the budget as the work happens, not after the project closes out. When a project is trending 8% over budget at the halfway point, you know it now and can make adjustments before it gets worse.

Scheduling and resource coordination

Project schedules with milestones, dependencies, and sub assignments. See all active projects on one screen. Know where every crew is, what materials are needed, and which projects are on track or behind. Dispatch notifications, schedule updates, and conflict alerts automated so your PMs spend time solving problems instead of tracking them down.

Invoicing, draw schedules, and financial dashboards

Progress billing tied to schedule of values. Draw requests auto-generated from project completion data. Payment follow-ups automated. AR aging visible in real time. The owner opens one dashboard and sees cash flow, project profitability, outstanding receivables, and overall business health without pulling a single manual report.

Whether you build houses or high-rises, the operational problems are the same.

The scale is different. The complexity varies. But the core challenge is identical: coordinating people, tracking money, and making sure nothing falls through the cracks.

Custom Home Builders
Production Builders
Remodelers
Design-Build
Commercial Tenant Improvement
Ground-Up Commercial
Multifamily
Mixed-Use
Institutional
Hospitality
Healthcare
Restaurant / Retail
Industrial / Warehouse
Senior Living
Student Housing
Most GCs need the Full Build. Here is why.

Revenue, production, and back office are inseparable for a GC

Your bid becomes your budget. Your budget drives your schedule. Your schedule triggers your billing. Every phase feeds the next. When the engines are separate, data gets re-entered at every handoff. When they are connected, an estimate flows into a project budget, the budget tracks against actuals in real time, and project completion triggers invoicing automatically. For a GC, the Full Build is not a luxury. It is the correct architecture.

Start with what hurts most, build out from there

If the Full Build is not in the budget right now, start with the engine that addresses your biggest pain point. Most commercial GCs start with the Production Engine because change order management and budget tracking are bleeding the most money. Most residential GCs start with the Revenue Engine because pipeline management and estimating are the bottleneck. Either way, the system is designed to scale.

Individual engines start at $5,000. Full Build starts at $15,300.

On a $5M GC doing 4-6% net, improving that margin by just 2 points is an additional $100,000 per year in profit. One properly captured change order on a single project can cover the cost of an entire engine implementation.

The full pricing breakdown with all three tiers is on each engine page.

See Full Build pricing See all services

You manage projects.
Let a system manage the rest.

Book a discovery call. We will walk through your operations, identify where margin is leaking, and show you what a connected system looks like for a general contractor running at your scale.

Book a discovery call View all services